BEOS ruling from Indian court

The Stanford Center for Law and Biosciences has decided to leave the WordPress servers for greener pastures: namely, the Stanford Law School blog aggregator.

This address will no longer be updated. All posts from this address have been migrated to the new address:

Please update your bookmarks and RSS feeds accordingly.

Below, you can download the full ruling in the murder case covered by the International Herald Tribune and New York Times earlier this fall, notable for the prosecution’s use of the “Brain Electrical Oscillations Signature test,” (BEOS) to  confirm that one defendant had “experiential knowledge” of the crime.  Two persons were convicted of the murder and sentenced to life in prison. (It is also available at the blog of Anand Giridharadas, the reporter who covered the story.)

We at the CLB are working on our response to the ruling, but we post it here in advance of our thoughts so interested persons may have a chance to read it for themselves first.  Watch this space for our analysis of the opinion and the BEOS technology described therein.  — Emily Murphy

Download the full opinion here


2 responses to “BEOS ruling from Indian court

  1. Pingback: Law and Biosciences Blog | Update on Indian BEOS case: Accused released on bail

  2. Pingback: Update on Indian BEOS case: Accused released on bail « Stanford Center for Law & the Biosciences Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s